Tuesday, February 24, 2009

Bibliographys for "Legacy Admissions"

News Paper Article
Laura, Randall. “The Other Legacies: Fac Brats.” New York Times 16 Jan. 2005: pg. 4A. 12. Academic Search Premier. ProQuest. Tompkins Cortland Community College Library. 22 Feb. 2009

Claim: Laura Randall the author for this article claims that legacy admissions definitely do exist in our collages and institutes. She claims that there is a large percentile of incoming students that are able to attend the collage through legacy admissions.
Evidence: Evidence for this claim is the following: Mark McMenamin decided to obtain a job at Mount Holyoke College, an all-woman’s collage, while looking into the future of his children. The benefit of him working there is that the collage waves tuition for full time employees that work there. In the University of California 20 percent of the freshmen are alumni students.
While is this a credible source: Laura Randall is not a writer of just one article or two. She has written many books including: The Political Economy of Brazilian Oil, The Political Economy of Mexican Oil and The Political Economy of Venezuelan Oil. She is also a professor at Hunter College, City Chair University and a co-chair of the Brazil Seminar of Columbia University.
You Tube Video
mkokai1. Pope Center's George Leef discusses legacy admissions. February 27, 2008. You Tube. 22 Feb. 2009 < v="actn2KyD4E0.">
http://www.popecenter.org/issues/article.html?id=1966
Claim: Money, money and more money is the issue that George addresses. From the information that he has received it seems to be that colleges are out there looking for more money rather than students. The more your parents gave the bigger chance you have of attending the collage or institute. Colleges are accepting athletes not students that want to learn something and put it to use in the public bringing forth profit to the rest of the people.
Evidence: There is a joke that has been spread that athletes can’t even read their diploma when they receive it. I don’t know how true this is but I think that it probably does happen at times. Sports are not the only issues when it comes to legacy admissions in schools. Parents who have contributed a large amount of to the college have no problems at all with getting their children to attend that collage. In 2003 Senator Edward Kennedy stated that he will try and do the best he can with making colleges show publicly their data on legacy admissions but it did not turn out so. Data (from the University of Virginia) shows that 65 percent of legacy admitted students contributed to the university’s capita campaign compared to 41 percent of the others who attended the university.
Why is this a reliable source: George Leef is vice president for research for the John William Pope Center for higher Education Policy. He has a Bachelor of Arts from Carroll College. He was Vice President of the John Locke Foundation until 2003. He also served as a book review editor for The Freeman and has published numerous articles in The Freeman, The Free Market, Cato Journal, The Detroit News, Independent Review and Regulation. George has written 37 article and 8 book reviews.
Scholarly Source
Author’s name: Espenshade, Thomas J
Title of article: Admission Preferences for Minority Students, Athletes, and Legacies at Elite Universities.
Name of scholarly journal: Social Science Quarterly
Volume and number: Vol. 85 Issue 5, p1422-1446, 25p, 7 charts, 1 graph
Database name: Business Source Premier
Publisher of databases: EBSCO Host
Where you accessed database: TC3
Date of access: 24 February 2009
URL: http://ezproxy.tc3.edu:2139/ehost/detail?vid=3&hid=9&sid=541c6730-e828-4fc1-9302-6b5195068ed1%40sessionmgr7&bdata=JmxvZ2lucGFnZT1Mb2dpbi5hc3Amc2l0ZT1laG9zdC1saXZl#db=buh&AN=15416322
Author’s Argument/claim: Legacy admissions are a growing issue among collages and institutions with a major role playing factors being a good athlete. Also the different races have also been examined and their acceptance into institutions.
Evidence: By 1997, in fact, being a recruited athlete mattered more than any other type of admission preference we have examined. What admissions officers look at when admitting new students to the institution are athletic ability, musical talent, rural background, lower socioeconomic status, gender, alumni connections, leadership ability, geography, and unusual life experiences (Fetter, 1995; Freedman, 2003; Zwick, 2002).

Why is this a credible source: Espenshade, Thomas J is, “a professor of Sociology and Faculty Associate of the Office of Population Research. His past research focuses on social demography, with a particular emphasis on population economics, mathematical demography, family and household demography, and contemporary immigration to the United States. His current research is focused on diversity in higher education. He served as Chair of the Department of Sociology at Princeton from 1999-2003 and as director of sociology's undergraduate program from 1998-2001. Espenshade received his B.A. degree in economics from The College of Wooster in 1965, a Master of Arts in Teaching in mathematics from Yale University in 1966, and a Ph.D. in economics from Princeton University in 1972. Prior to joining the Princeton faculty in 1988, he held teaching or research positions at the University of California (Berkeley), Bowdoin College, Florida State University, The Urban Institute (Washington, D.C.), and Brown University.”

Wednesday, February 18, 2009

Final Essay

Andrey Bushmich

Professor Sicroff

English 101, Section M03

February 18, 2009

Same-sex education
After WWI and WWII the segregation of sexes in school and work places has been protested by woman. The passing of Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 prohibited discrimination on the basis of sex in any federally funded education program or activity, opening the doors for co-education and soon almost wiping out single-sex schools. A percentage of single-sex schools caused a controversy between single-sex education and co-education as to which one is most profitable.
Malacova, Eva, a writer of many articles and journals on education says co-education is not the best solution for students although, in the United States, single sex schools have almost disappeared after Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 was passed. A study was performed on students in single-sex co-educational schools. This information was obtained from the Assessment and Qualifications Alliance (AQA) involving 3959 schools and 497,161 students ranging from fourteen to sixteen years old. Data and graphs collected from (AQA) show that both boys and girls do better in single-sex schools compared to co-educational schools.
Anfara Jr., Vincent and Mertens, Steven, writers of the article, “Do Single-Sex Classes and Schools Make a Difference?” say that single-sex schools mainly benefit those with specific needs or disabilities. According to Tyack and Hansot (1990) and Hawtry (1986), co-education became dominant over single-sex education because combined schools coast less than separate schools.
The authors of both studies agree that SS education can improve academic performance. Malacova argues that nearly every student will perform better in SS schools while Anfara and Meretens state that only students with learning problems or disabilities will benefit significantly from SS education.
From the obtained research most will say that co-educational schools offer the best education. Others argue that performance of students in SS schools is better. The Department of Education, in the United States, allows communities to have the opportunity to decide if they want to offer SS classes. Some students are capable of working under almost any circumstance there for not allowing those to attend co-educational schools would be pointless.






References

MLA
(Modern Language Assoc.)
Works Cited
Malacova, Eva. "Effect of single-sex education on progress in GCSE." Oxford Review of Education 33.2 (May 2007): 233-259. Academic Search Premier. EBSCO. [Library name], [City], [State abbreviation]. 12 Feb. 2009 .
MLA
(Modern Language Assoc.)
Works Cited
Anfara Jr., Vincent A., and Steven B. Mertens.. "Do Single-Sex Classes and Schools Make a Difference?." Middle School Journal 40.2 (Nov. 2008): 52-59. Education Research Complete. EBSCO. [Library name], [City], [State abbreviation]. 12 Feb. 2009 .


Tuesday, February 17, 2009

Book Help for SAW

http://wps.ablongman.com/long_behrens_saw_1
is the web site.

Same-Sex Education video (Andrey Bushmich)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WjBmSspXc3s


Refrences

Same Sex Education. Pokerazzi. You Tube, November 16, 2006. February 17, 2009
<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WjBmSspXc3s&feature=related>.

The following video stated that from November 24,2008 Woodward Elementary School were allowed to have segregation in the school. Originally school segregation is remembered for separating African Americans from white students. The video states that Same-Sex education provided a separate curriculum for boys and girls. In this situation both sex's with have the same work and strategies but be separated during schools. When the children where questioned on this matter the girls said that would not feel embarrassed if they did something wrong because the boys would not be there to make fun of them. On the other hand the boys said, " Girls need their own bubble." Both the students and the administrators seem to agree with this type of education.

Thursday, February 5, 2009

Annotated Bibliography Worksheet

#1

Annotated Bibliography Worksheet

Author’s name: Anfara Jr., Vincent A.1 Mertens, Steven B.2


Title of article: Do Single-Sex Classes and Schools Make a Difference?

Name of scholarly journal: Middle School Journal

Volume and Number: Vol. 40 Issue 2, p52-59, 8p, 2

Database name: EBSCO Host

Publisher of database: Education Research Complete

Where you accessed database: Home

Date of access: Feb. 4, 2009

URL: http://ezproxy.tc3.edu:2048/login?url=http://ezproxy.tc3.edu:2143/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ehh&AN=34973402&loginpage=Login.asp&site=ehost-live

Author’s Argument: Does not agree that single sex education has a benefit.


Claim: "Benefits of single-sex schooling remains unclear"

Evidence: Derived from National Tests and public examinations in England. This whole study of single-sex edu. vs. Co-ed. all originated in 1969,1971,1974 from "Dale" stating that co-edu. provided a happier enviorment for the students. In the USA it has been said that girls do benefit from single sex education, (Lee&Bryk 1986). Positive effect on girls from single sex-edu. has been reported in Irland(hannan et al., 1996), Belgium (van houtte, 2004b), Hong kong (wong et al., 2002), Nigeria (lee & lockheed, 1990) and Australia (rowe, 1988).... spielhofer et al. (2004). KS2 1996 linked to 2001 GSCE showed that boys over all performed better in single sex grammar schools but especially lower level boys also did surprisingly better in single-sex schools. About 3959 schools and 497,161 people were involved development of this study.

Assumptions: Some believe that single sex-education shows better results for students only because they test and admit the best of the best. In other terms only smart students can get into these schools although not all single-sex schools admit only extensively smart students into their facilities.

Why do you think this is a credible source?: Data for this essay was derived from National Tests and public examinations from England.





#2

Annotated Bibliography Worksheet

Author’s name: Malacova, Eva

Title of article: Effect of single-sex education on progress in GCSE.

Name of scholarly journal: Oxford Review of Education

Volume and Number: May2007, Vol. 33 Issue 2, p233-259, 27p, 14 charts

Database name: EBSCO Host

Publisher of database: Education Research Complete

Where you accessed database: home

Date of access: Feb. 4, 2009

URL: http://ezproxy.tc3.edu:2048/login?url=http://ezproxy.tc3.edu:2143/login.aspx?direct=true&db=aph&AN=24827613&loginpage=Login.asp&site=ehost-live


Author’s Argument: Single sex education is better than coeducation.

Claim: "There was also strong evidence suggesting that pupils achieve higher progress in the independent sector compared to grammar education."

Evidence: First of all single sex education was in the United States publicly until the 19th century. it has been said that the united states does not practice single-sex education due to expenses. Coeducation has risen and taken over schooling because the price of one school vs. supporting two separate schools is allot cheaper so America turned to coeducation according to Tyack and Hansot (1990) and Hawtry (1986). Also the rise of feminism, women's rights movement and the passage of Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 strenthed the fact that public schools should be co-ed. Research shows that SS (single-sex) schools mainly benefit those with specific needs or disabilities compared to students who were not in need of specific help. The Department of Edu. does give communities the opportunity to decide if they want to offer SS schools or classes. Some say separate is "inherently unequal" (phrase taken from the Brown vs. Board of Education). "Greenberger, from the Nation Woman's Law Center, characterized single-sex education as, 'an invitation to discriminate'." National Coalition for Women and Girls in Education said that the same out come can be achieved from coeducation by just making the classes smaller, getting better teachers and parents taking a bigger role in their child's education. SS schools does not offer AP course which is said to bring out teasing among those who can take these courses.

Assumptions:

Why do you think this is a credible source?: Information for this discussion has been documented professionally and taken from widely known books and resources. Opinion is not brought in from the author of this article, only cited and documented information is used.